Progressive pulmonary fibrosis in systemic autoimmune diseases. A real life study.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung diseases associated with systemic autoimmune diseases (ILD-SAD) can progress to a fibrotic form that can benefit from antifibrotic treatment. The aim of the study is to describe a cohort of patients with ILD-SAD who manifest progressive pulmonary fibrosis treated with antifibrotics. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective observational study from a tertiary care hospital on a cohort of patients with ILD-SAD with progressive pulmonary fibrosis evaluated in a joint pulmonology and rheumatology clinic that initiated treatment with antifibrotic drugs between 01/01/2019 and 01/12/2021. Clinical characteristics were analysed. The evolution of pulmonary function test and adverse effects during treatment were described. RESULTS: 18 patients were included. The mean age was 66.7 ±â€¯12.7 years, with a higher frequency of females (66.7%). Systemic sclerosis (SS) was the most frequent systemic autoimmune disease (36.8%). The majority of patients were receiving systemic glucocorticoid treatment (88.9%), 72.2% of patients were receiving treatment with disease-modifying drugs, the most frequent being mycophenolate mofetil (38.9%), and 22.2% with rituximab. Functional stability was observed after the start of antifibrotic treatment. Two patients died during follow-up, one due to progression of ILD. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests a beneficial effect of antifibrotic treatment added to immunomodulatory treatment in patients with fibrotic ILD-SAD in real life. In our cohort, patients with ILD-SAD with progressive fibrosing involvement show functional stability after starting antifibrotic treatment. Treatment tolerance was relatively good with a side effect profile similar to that described in the medical literature.

Fibrosis pulmonar en enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas. Un estudio en vida real / Progressive pulmonary fibrosis in systemic autoimmune diseases. A real life study

Introducción: Las enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales difusas asociadas a enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas (EPID-EAS) pueden presentar una progresión fibrótica. El objetivo principal del estudio es describir una serie de casos de pacientes con EPID-EAS que cursan con fibrosis pulmonar progresiva e inician tratamiento con fármacos antifibróticos. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo unicéntrico de un hospital de tercer nivel sobre una serie de casos de pacientes con EPID-EAS con fibrosis pulmonar progresiva valorados en una consulta conjunta de neumología y reumatología, que iniciaron tratamiento con fármacos antifibróticos entre el 01/01/2019 y el 01/12/2021. Se analizaron las características epidemiológicas, clínicas, funcionales, radiológicas y terapéuticas al inicio del tratamiento, y la evolución funcional durante el tratamiento, así como los efectos adversos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 18 pacientes. La edad media observada fue de 66,7±12,7 años, con mayor frecuencia de sexo femenino (66,7%), siendo la esclerosis sistémica la enfermedad autoinmune sistémica más frecuente (36,8%). La mayoría de los pacientes se encontraban en tratamiento con glucocorticoides sistémicos (88,9%), un 72,2% de pacientes con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad, siendo el más frecuente el micofenolato mofetilo (38,9%), y un 22,2% con rituximab. Se observó una estabilidad funcional tras el inicio del tratamiento antifibrótico. Fallecieron 2 pacientes durante el seguimiento, uno de ellos como consecuencia de la progresión de la enfermedad intersticial pulmonar. Conclusión: Nuestro estudio sugiere un efecto beneficioso del tratamiento antifibrótico añadido al tratamiento inmunomodulador en pacientes con EPID-EAS fibrótica en vida real. En nuestra serie de casos, los pacientes con EPID-EAS con afectación fibrosante progresiva muestran una estabilidad funcional tras el inicio del tratamiento antifibrótico...(AU)

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases associated with systemic autoimmune diseases (ILD-SAD) can progress to a fibrotic form that can benefit from antifibrotic treatment. The aim of the study is to describe a cohort of patients with ILD-SAD who manifest progressive pulmonary fibrosis treated with antifibrotics. Methods: Single-centre retrospective observational study from a tertiary care hospital on a cohort of patients with ILD-SAD with progressive pulmonary fibrosis evaluated in a joint pulmonology and rheumatology clinic that initiated treatment with antifibrotic drugs between 01/01/2019 and 01/12/2021. Clinical characteristics were analysed. The evolution of pulmonary function test and adverse effects during treatment were described. Results: 18 patients were included. The mean age was 66.7±12.7 years, with a higher frequency of females (66.7%). Systemic sclerosis (SS) was the most frequent systemic autoimmune disease (36.8%). The majority of patients were receiving systemic glucocorticoid treatment (88.9%), 72.2% of patients were receiving treatment with disease-modifying drugs, the most frequent being mycophenolate mofetil (38.9%), and 22.2% with rituximab. Functional stability was observed after the start of antifibrotic treatment. Two patients died during follow-up, one due to progression of ILD. Conclusion: Our study suggests a beneficial effect of antifibrotic treatment added to immunomodulatory treatment in patients with fibrotic ILD-SAD in real life. In our cohort, patients with ILD-SAD with progressive fibrosing involvement show functional stability after starting antifibrotic treatment. Treatment tolerance was relatively good with a side effect profile similar to that described in the medical literature.(AU)

Myositis autoantibodies detected by line blot immunoassay: clinical associations and correlation with antibody signal intensity.

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between myositis specific (MSA) and myositis associated (MAA) antibodies and diagnosis (including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [IIM] and other systemic autoimmune diseases [SAID]), and to explore the impact of antibody signal intensity in diagnostic accuracy. We retrospectively reviewed all the serum samples obtained from patients tested for MSA/MAA by line immunoassay (LIA) between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2020 in Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Spain). Clinical true positive (CTP) MSAs and MAAs were defined as those patients with IIM or SAID with phenotypes expected of that MSA/MAA. Patients who did not have a phenotype compatible with that antibody were classified as clinical false positive (CFP). One hundred and thirty positive samples were analysed. Forty-six patients (33.38%) were classified as IIM, forty-two (32.3%) as SAID and forty-two (32.3%) as non-IIM/SAID. Among these 130 patients, 164 MSA/MAA were detected. Eighty-five (51.8%) positive MSA/MAA were classified as CTP, and seventy-nine (48.2%) as CFP. Strongly positive antibodies were more frequently CTP (35/47, 74.5%) than weak positives (54/68, 36.8%), (p ˂ 0.001). Antibodies classified as CTP had a higher signal intensity than CFP (36.77 AU vs 20.00 AU, CI95% 7.79-22.09, p ˂ 0.001). The probability of a CFP was associated to negative ANA, low ANA titer, and multiple positive MSA/MAA (p Ë‚ 0.001). In this study, we confirmed that CFP results using LIA are frequent, and are associated with low signal intensity MSA/MAA, negative ANA, lower titer ANA, and with multiple positive samples.

Clinical Characteristics of Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy and Comparison With Adult Patients: Analysis From a Multicentric Cohort in Spain.

METHODS: This study reviewed the medical records of patients from the REMICAM cohort, a multicentric longitudinal study carried out in patients with IIM, followed up between 1980 and 2014 in 12 hospitals in Madrid, Spain. Patients with definite or probable JPM, JDM, adult DM, and adult PM according to the modified Bohan and Peter criteria were selected. We compared the characteristics between JDM and JPM, and between JIIM and adult IIM. RESULTS: Eighty-six juvenile patients (75 JDMs and 11 JPMs) and 283 adult patients (133 DMs and 150 PMs) were included. Compared with patients with JDM, patients with JPM were older at diagnosis, had more fever and arthritis, and were less frequently treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (these differences were not statistically significant). Compared with patients with adult DM, those with JDM presented more frequently with calcinosis (33.8% vs 6.9%, p < 0.0001) and had less severe infections (4.3% vs 23.4%, p < 0.0001), malignancies (1.3% vs 25.6%, p < 0.0001), and mortality (3.5% vs 33%, p < 0.0001). Patients with JDM were treated less frequently with azathioprine (10.8% vs 44.7%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that JIIMs are a heterogeneous group of diseases with relevant differences compared with adult IIMs.

Perspectives on glucocorticoid usage in patients with adult inflammatory myopathy.

This study aims to describe the patient perspective on glucocorticoid (GC) treatment and adverse effects (AEs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). An online survey was distributed to patients with adult-onset IIM using the Myositis UK page on Healthunlocked.com, an online social network for health. Respondents were asked to rate the severity of AEs they attributed to GCs on a Likert scale (0-5), and to report concerns and overall experience of GC treatment. The survey was completed by 122 respondents. The median reported current daily dose of prednisolone was 15 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 8, 25) and median treatment duration 5.3 years (IQR 3.4, 8.0) at the time of survey completion. Only 54% of respondents "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the information provided to them about GC treatment was adequate. AEs rated most severe by respondents were weight gain, moon face, sleep disturbances and increased hunger. The duration of GC treatment weakly correlated with the mean number of reported AEs (p = 0.004) and mean severity of AEs (p = 0.017). There was an inverse relationship between age and acne, stretch marks, hair loss, facial hair, nausea and heartburn (p < 0.05). In this first study of patient-reported experiences of GCs specifically in IIM, we describe the burden of treatment and highlight the unmet need for safe and well-tolerated treatments. We report that patients with IIM often remain on long-term GC treatment at moderate doses, and that AEs are common. The reported data will be useful in planning discussions with patients regarding adherence to their treatment options. Key Points • Glucocorticoids (GC) are the first-line treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and are associated with a wide range of adverse effects • The adverse effects related to GC are very common, and those reported most severe by patients included weight gain, moon face, increased hunger or sleep disturbance, which may differ from the primary concerns of their treating clinician • Understanding the patient perspective and concerns about treatment is necessary to maintain a good physician-patient relationship and may help with treatment adherence.

Polymyositis: is there anything left? A retrospective diagnostic review from a tertiary myositis centre.

OBJECTIVE: The current classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) retain PM as a major disease subgroup. However, evolution in the understanding of IIM has suggested that many of these patients could be better described as having an alternative diagnosis. In the present study, we apply the latest understanding of IIM subtyping to retrospectively review PM diagnoses in a large cohort of IIM patients. METHODS: Within a previously reported cohort of 255 patients from a UK tertiary myositis clinic, 37 patients classified as PM according to both the EULAR/ACR IIM criteria and expert opinion were identified. Clinical data and complementary tests were reviewed, and consensus decisions regarding final classification were reached in each case. RESULTS: Nine (9/37, 24.3%) patients remained classified as PM, 3.5% (9/255) of the original cohort; these PM patients were seronegative for myositis antibodies, responsive to immunosuppression, and in 4/7 (57.1%) patients where muscle biopsy was performed had HLA-1 upregulation and endomysial inflammatory infiltrates. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (5/37, 13.5%) and connective tissue disease overlap myositis (7/37, 19%) were the main alternative diagnoses. The remaining patients were diagnosed as: unspecified myopathy (6/37, 16%), dermatomyositis (2/37, 5%), cancer-associated myopathy (3/37, 8.1%), and non-inflammatory myopathy (1/37, 3%, myofibrillar myopathy). Four patients (4/37, 10%) had insufficient data available to confidently reclassify. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that PM can now be considered a rare IIM subgroup. A thorough examination, complete myositis autoantibody panel, and careful interpretation of the biopsy results is recommended to confirm the correct IIM sub-type.

Rheumatoid meningitis as a complication of long-standing rheumatoid arthritis: a case treated with rituximab.

Rheumatoid meningitis is a rare complication of long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. We present the case of a 39-year-old Bolivian woman with a history of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis of 12 years of evolution without extra-articular manifestations that develops a severe headache with vomiting. The diagnosis of rheumatoid meningitis was performed based on clinical history, blood count and biochemistry results, cerebrospinal fluid analysis and cranial magnetic resonance imaging findings. High-dose intravenous glucocorticoids were started, followed by rituximab. After treatment, a significant clinical improvement was observed and repeat magnetic resonance imaging scan confirmed an improvement of the meningeal lesions.

High rates of severe disease and death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in rheumatic disease patients treated with rituximab: a descriptive study.

The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD) patients who were treated with rituximab and had suspected or confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In this descriptive study, RMD patients who were treated with rituximab in the last 12 months at the Rheumatology Department of our hospital were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection via telephone interview and a comprehensive review of clinical health records (01/02/2020-26/05/2020). Those with probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. In total, 76 patients were screened. Of these, 13 (17.1%) had suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. With regard to these 13 patients, the median age at coronavirus disease (COVID-19) diagnosis was 68 years (range 28-76 years) and 8 (61.5%) were female. Five patients had rheumatoid arthritis, three had systemic vasculitis, two had Sjögren syndrome, and two had systemic lupus erythematosus. Additionally, seven patients (53.8%) had pulmonary involvement secondary to RMD. Eight patients (61.5%) developed severe disease leading to hospitalization, and seven developed bilateral pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency. Of the eight hospitalized patients, five (62.5%) fulfilled the acute respiratory distress syndrome criteria and three developed a critical disease and died. Our cohort had a high rate of severe disease requiring hospitalization (61.5%), with bilateral pneumonia and hyperinflammation leading to a high mortality rate (23.1%). Treatment with rituximab should be considered a possible risk factor for unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients with RMD. However, further study is required to confirm this association.

Large vessel vasculitis secondary to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.

Aortitis is a rare entity that may cause fever of unknown origin. This entity has a wide various etiologies, which main cause is rheumatologic, but not only. Iatrogenia has also been described, including chemotherapy and supporting treatment (like granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in oncological patients. The evidence in favour of this pharmacological link is growing. The differential diagnosis of fever, in febrile neutropenia setting, can be difficult to itemize.

Leishmaniasis visceral en un paciente con artritis reumatoide en tratamiento con metotrexato / Visceral leishmaniasis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate

Los pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) pueden presentar un número amplio de complicaciones, siendo de especial importancia las de etiología infecciosa. Su elevada incidencia está muy ligada al uso de inmunosupresores. El espectro de agentes causantes de infecciones oportunistas en pacientes con AR es muy amplio; sin embargo, son relativamente escasos los casos de infección por Leishmania, especialmente en pacientes sin tratamiento con fármacos biológicos

A large number of complications have been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), those of infectious etiology being of special relevance. Their high incidence is closely linked to the use of immunosuppressive medication. The spectrum of agents causing opportunistic infections in patients with RA is very broad; however, there are relatively few cases of Leishmania infection, especially in patients not being treated with biological drugs

Visceral leishmaniasis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate. / Leishmaniasis visceral en un paciente con artritis reumatoide en tratamiento con metotrexato.

A large number of complications have been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), those of infectious etiology being of special relevance. Their high incidence is closely linked to the use of immunosuppressive medication. The spectrum of agents causing opportunistic infections in patients with RA is very broad; however, there are relatively few cases of Leishmania infection, especially in patients not being treated with biological drugs.